On April 25, 2024, Siam News reporters reported that at the Khlong Thom Center Market area, Worachak Road, Pom Prap Subdistrict, Pom Prap Sattru Phai District, Bangkok, Mr. Kritsada Inthamara, nicknamed the cheating lawyer. Came to help traders at Khlong Thom Market. who were executed by the law enforcement officers The Asset Forfeiture Division, Legal Execution Department, carried out the eviction according to the order of the Southern Bangkok Civil Court. Find the red number at Village No. 73/2009, led by Police Lieutenant Colonel Rungroj. Nia Khun Thot, Phlapphlachai Police Station, District 1, who came to join in maintaining peace and order.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!
When the shophouse owner, Mrs. Mali Ekariyakul, former secretary of the Bamrung Mueang Party (The court ordered the dissolution of the party in 2014, the former owner of Bamrungmuang Plaza) arrived. Police officers served an arrest warrant at the Southern Bangkok Civil Court No. 98/2011 dated 10 August 2011 at Sai Thong Company. Crown Property Company Limited is the plaintiff, with the Suan Monarch Property Office. is a co-plaintiff, with Ms. Mali as the defendant. The offense must be found to be a violation of Failure to comply with the court’s judgment to be sent to court without a statute of limitations So he read the arrest warrant and informed Mrs. Mali of her rights. before being detained and entered in the diary at Phlapphla Chai Police Station, District 1 before immediately taking him to the Southern Bangkok Civil Court.
Mr. Kritsada gave a detailed statement in this case saying: He received a complaint from Mrs. Mali. that the company This has been done since 1909 by filing a lawsuit in the Civil Court. Until an arrest warrant was issued for Khun Mali, as the police informed of the arrest warrant. Released in June 2011 It is a demonstration of special power within 8 days before asking the court for approval to issue an arrest warrant. The issue is that the company used an old warrant from 2011 to attack the tenant. In the warrant there is the Crown Property Bureau. is also a joint plaintiff.
which the injured person or renter sees Company actions This is against the policy of the Property Office, which only gives rights to the company to organize traders. The company uses the method of dismantling by cutting the keys and breaking in to take the products out and pack them in boxes. Such an action would cause damage to the product, which is very unfair to Mrs. Mali and therefore is considered contrary to the policy of the Property Office. Therefore, since Ms. Mali did not receive justice and suffered greatly from the company. plaintiff and the Property Office, the joint plaintiffs have exhausted their defense by submitting a petition asking for fairness to the King as a last resort.